Beasley v. City of Daytona Beach et al
| CEDRIC BEASLEY |
| MARCUS BOOTH, JAMES MAHER and City of Daytona Beach |
| 6:2021cv00850 |
| May 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Gregory J Kelly |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #5 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part #11 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 21 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 7/15/2021. (MJB)
|
|
Filing 19
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #8 Motion to Dismiss. The motion has been amended, see doc 11. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 6/24/2021. (Presnell, Gregory)
|
| Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Cedric Beasley. (Huggins, Arthur) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Cedric Beasley. (Huggins, Arthur) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Cedric Beasley. Related case(s): Yes (RDO) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #12 Order to show cause filed by Cedric Beasley. (Huggins, Arthur) |
| Filing 14 (WRONG EVENT CODE. REFILED AT #16) NOTICE by Cedric Beasley (Huggins, Arthur) Modified on 6/11/2021 (RDO). |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order by Cedric Beasley. (Huggins, Arthur) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER for Plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, which may include dismissal of this case, for failure to respond to the Court's initial case order. Show Cause Response due by 6/24/2021. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 6/10/2021. (LAM)
|
| Filing 11 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by City of Daytona Beach. (Byers, Brandon) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by City of Daytona Beach. Related case(s): Yes (Byers, Brandon) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order by City of Daytona Beach. (Byers, Brandon) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss complaint by City of Daytona Beach. (Byers, Brandon) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order by Marcus Booth, James Maher. (Bogan, Bruce) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Marcus Booth, James Maher. Related case(s): Yes (Bogan, Bruce) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Marcus Booth, James Maher. (Bogan, Bruce) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 5/19/2021. (DS)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Judge Kelly's Standing Discovery Order Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 5/18/2021. (MB)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Gregory A. Presnell and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:21-cv-0850-GAP-GJK. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY FLORIDA, case number 2021-30366-CICI filed in State Court on March 15, 2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-18257237 filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Byers, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
