DeFrank v. Blanco-Polanco et al
| Daniel DeFrank |
| John Doe and Jose Blanco-Polanco |
| United States of America |
| 6:2021cv00937 |
| June 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Gregory J Kelly |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 MOTION to Substitute Party - to Substitute the United States for Defendant Blanco-Polanco - filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibits 1 - 6)(Smart, Adam) |
| Set deadline as to #2 MOTION to Substitute Party - to Substitute the United States for Defendant Blanco-Polanco -. Replies due by 7/15/2021. (LDJ) |
Filing 24
ENDORSED ORDER granting #22 the United States' and Plaintiff's Joint Motion to Stay Deadlines. Deadlines in this case are STAYED pending resolution of the United States' Motion to Substitute (Doc. 2). After resolution of the Motion to Substitute, Plaintiff will have twenty one (21) days to respond to the United States' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21). Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 7/8/21. (EBU)
|
|
Filing 23
ENDORSED ORDER granting #20 the United States' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Reply. By Thursday, July 15, 2021, the United States may file a reply not to exceed fourteen (14) pages. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 7/8/21. (EBU)
|
| Filing 22 Joint MOTION to Stay Deadlines Until Court Rules on Motion to Substitute by United States of America. (Smart, Adam) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by United States of America. (Smart, Adam) |
| Filing 20 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Other Document :Reply re: Motion to Substitute by United States of America. (Smart, Adam) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Substitute Party - to Substitute the United States for Defendant Blanco-Polanco - AMENDED filed by Daniel DeFrank. (Zielinski, John) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Substitute Party - to Substitute the United States for Defendant Blanco-Polanco - filed by Daniel DeFrank. (Zielinski, John) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER Judge Kelly's Standing Order on Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 6/17/2021. (HMK)
|
| Filing 16 Remark: Doc. #14 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 6/16/21. (EBU) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Daniel DeFrank (Zielinski, John) Modified text on 6/16/2021 (LDJ). |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #7 Order pdf by Daniel DeFrank. (Zielinski, John) |
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response / Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A Baker on 6/15/2021. (Baker, David)
|
| Reset deadline as to #2 MOTION to Substitute Party - to Substitute the United States for Defendant Blanco-Polanco -. Responses due by 6/28/2021 (LDJ) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time until 6/28/21 to File Response/Reply to the United States' Motion to Substitute the United States for Defendant Jose Blanco-Polanco by Daniel DeFrank. (Zielinski, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. Modified text on 6/14/2021 (LDJ). |
| Filing 11 Remark: Doc. #9 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 6/14/21. (EBU) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by United States of America. Related case(s): Yes (Smart, Adam) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #7 Order pdf by United States of America. (Smart, Adam) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT Certification Under Rule 3.01(g)(3) - Notification that Motion is Opposed re #2 MOTION to Substitute Party - to Substitute the United States for Defendant Blanco-Polanco by United States of America. (Smart, Adam) Modified text on 6/14/2021 (LDJ). |
| Set/reset deadlines/hearings: for All Defendants. Answer due by 7/9/2021. (RDO) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER re Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 6/3/2021. (BIA) (ctp)
|
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. All Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A Baker on 6/3/2021. (Baker, David)
|
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT Certification Under Rule 3.01(g)(3) - Notification that Motion is Unopposed re #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by United States of America. (Smart, Adam) Modified text on 6/3/2021 (MEJ). |
| Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:21-cv-0937-RBD-GJK. (SJB) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by United States of America. (Smart, Adam) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Substitute Party - to Substitute the United States for Defendant Blanco-Polanco - by United States of America. (Smart, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Circuit Court, case number 2021-CA-004781-O filed in State Court on 05/06/2021. filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Served Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Acting U.S. Attorney Certification, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 State Court COMPLAINT, #5 State Court Other Documents, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smart, Adam) Modified text on 6/1/2021 (LDJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
