Camilli v. Chief, Immigrant Investor Program, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Camilli Renato and Renato Camilli |
Division Chief Lori Mackenzie, Director Tracy Renaud, Chief Sarah Kendall, Attorney General US Merrick Garland, Secretary David Pekoske, Chief, Immigrant Investor Program, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Division Chief, Immigrant Investor Program, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice |
6:2021cv01042 |
June 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Wendy W Berger |
Embry J Kidd |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 7/21/2021. (RMF)ctp |
Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed as to the United States by Renato Camilli. (Hurd, Rusten) Text modified on 7/8/2021 (RDO). |
Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Renato Camilli. Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice served on 7/2/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Renato Camilli. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security served on 7/2/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by Renato Camilli. Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 7/2/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed by Renato Camilli. Division Chief, Immigrant Investor Program, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 7/6/2021, answer due 9/7/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed by Renato Camilli. Chief, Immigrant Investor Program, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 7/2/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 6/23/2021. (RMF)ctp |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (KNC) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:21-cv-1042-WWB-EJK. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief against Merrick Garland, Sarah Kendall, Lori Mackenzie, David Pekoske, Tracy Renaud (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18379252) filed by Camilli Renato. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons (Kendall), #3 Proposed Summons (Mackenzie), #4 Proposed Summons (Renaud), #5 Proposed Summons (Pekoske), #6 Proposed Summons (Garland), #7 Proposed Summons (Hoppman))(Hurd, Rusten) Modified on 6/21/2021 (removed duplicate text) (KNC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.