Llamas et al v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
Noelle Llamas and Ken Klippenstein |
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Marshals Service and U.S. Department of Justice |
6:2021cv01169 |
July 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Roy B Dalton |
Leslie R Hoffman |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. § 0552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Remark: Doc. #19 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 9/14/2021. (LLM) |
Filing 19 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #18 Order directing compliance by Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Marshals Service. (Smart, Adam) |
Filing 18 ORDER directing compliance to #12 Initial Order. On or before September 24, 2021, the Defendants are DIRECTED to file a Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement that comply with the Court's order. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 9/10/2021. (BIA) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re #1 Complaint. All Defendants' answer or response due by 9/20/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman on 8/16/2021. (MKH) |
Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time until 9/18/21 to File Answer re #1 Complaint by All Defendants. (Smart, Adam) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. Modified text on 8/16/2021 (LDJ). |
Filing 15 Remark: Doc. #14 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 8/9/2021. (LLM) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #12 Order pdf by Ken Klippenstein, Noelle Llamas identifying Corporate Parent The Intercept for Ken Klippenstein, Noelle Llamas. (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Ken Klippenstein, Noelle Llamas. Related case(s): No (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 12 INITIAL ORDER re Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 7/23/2021. (BIA) (ctp) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LDJ) |
Filing 10 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. New case number: 6:21-cv-1169-RBD-LRH. (SJB) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED summons to be issued by KEN KLIPPENSTEIN, NOELLE LLAMAS. (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED summons to be issued by KEN KLIPPENSTEIN, NOELLE LLAMAS. (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 7 PROPOSED summons to be issued by KEN KLIPPENSTEIN, NOELLE LLAMAS. (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED summons to be issued by KEN KLIPPENSTEIN, NOELLE LLAMAS. (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by KEN KLIPPENSTEIN, NOELLE LLAMAS. (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 PROPOSED summons to be issued by KEN KLIPPENSTEIN, NOELLE LLAMAS. (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED summons to be issued by KEN KLIPPENSTEIN, NOELLE LLAMAS. (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED summons to be issued by KEN KLIPPENSTEIN, NOELLE LLAMAS. (Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18487220) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bourdon, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.