Dormeyer v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
stacie dormeyer |
Armor Correctional Health Services and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. |
6:2021cv01270 |
August 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Roy B Dalton |
Daniel C Irick |
Labor: Fair Standards |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0704 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Remark: Doc. #6 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 8/18/2021. (LLM) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Related Action; Related Cases: No by Stacie Dormeyer (Glasser, David) Modified on 8/18/2021 (KNC). |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Stacie Dormeyer. (Glasser, David) |
Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER re Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 8/12/2021. (BIA) (ctp) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. (KNC) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED summons to be issued by stacie dormeyer. (Glasser, David) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:21-cv-1270-RBD-DCI. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Armor Correctional Health Services with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18563013) filed by stacie dormeyer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Glasser, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.