Robertson v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Pierce Robertson
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections and Patricia Ciuzio
Case Number: 6:2021cv01538
Filed: September 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Daniel C Irick
Referring Judge: Carlos E Mendoza
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2021 Filing 8 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SPM)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/14/2021. (KMS)
September 29, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Pierce Robertson. (SPM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick.
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER AND DIRECTIONS TO THE CLERK denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall amend his complaint as described in this Order within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to fully comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis using the approved long form or shall pay the full filing fee. Failure to do so within this time will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a standard non-prisoner civil rights form and an Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (long form) along with this Order. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 9/27/2021. (RN)
September 24, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of filing proposed service forms by Pierce Robertson (SPM)
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 2/1/2021. (RN)
September 17, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Pierce Robertson. (SPM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick.
September 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Patricia Ciuzio, Florida Department of Corrections with Jury Demand filed by Pierce Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SPM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robertson v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pierce Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Ciuzio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?