DeLeon v. Leachman-DeLeon et al
Kevin Edward DeLeon |
Patricia E. Leachman-DeLeon and Rayon Raymond Leachman |
6:2021cv01593 |
September 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Leslie R Hoffman |
G Kendall Sharp |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Kevin Edward DeLeon. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(ARJ) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Patricia E. Leachman-DeLeon, Rayon Raymond Leachman against Kevin Edward DeLeon. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (TNP) |
Filing 3 ORDER dismissing case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 10/5/2021. (SC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE: Parties are required to file a Notice of a Related Action, Local Rule 1.07(c), that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District of Florida or elsewhere (not required if there are no related actions), within 14 days from the date of this Notice. Signed by Deputy Clerk. (copy mailed) (AKC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rayon Raymond Leachman, Patricia E. Leachman-DeLeon filed by Kevin Edward DeLeon. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (No fee payment or IFP motion filed) (ARJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.