Luecke v. Florida Department of Children and Families et al
Plaintiff: Tessa Luecke
Defendant: Florida Department of Children and Families, Stephen Toner, Florida Fifth District Court of Appeals, Rachel Batten, Shevaun Harris and Jennifer Frericks
Case Number: 6:2021cv01657
Filed: October 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Daniel C Irick
Referring Judge: Gregory J Kelly
2 Judge: Carlos E Mendoza
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2021 Set deadlines: Second Amended Complaint due by 12/20/2021 Amended Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis due by 12/20/2021 (ARJ)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER adopting #8 Report and Recommendations; denying #5 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. On or before December 20, 2021, Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint. Failure to timely file a Second Amended Complaint, or failure to comply with the pleading requirements outlined in the Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 8 at 5-6), may result in dismissal of this case with prejudice without further notice. On or before December 20, 2021, Plaintiff may also file an Amended Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 12/1/2021. (MEH) Copies mailed.
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER denying #11 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL OR GUARDIAN AD LITEM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 11/30/2021. (MB)
November 19, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Designation of E-Mail address by Tessa Luecke. (RDO)
November 19, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel or Guardian Ad Litem by Tessa Luecke. (RDO) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly.
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 11/12/2021. (MEH) Copies mailed.
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 11/12/2021. (MEH) Copies mailed.
November 10, 2021 Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #5 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. It is RECOMMENDED that the Court: 1. DENY the Amended Motion (Doc. No. 5); 2. DISMISS the case without prejudice; and 3. Grant Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint within a time established by the Court along with a second amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis, with the warning that failure to file a second amended complaint within the time permitted by the Court will result in dismissal of the case without further notice. A party has fourteen days from the date the Report and Recommendation is served to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. Failure to serve written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. 11th Cir. R. 3-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 11/10/2021. (MB)
November 5, 2021 Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:21-cv-01657-CEM-GJK. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick no longer assigned to the case. Motion REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly: #5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency. (ALL)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER directing the Clerk to re-assign this case to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly, with his permission, for consideration with 6:21-cv-01656-CEM-GJK. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 11/4/2021. (Irick, Daniel)
November 3, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis/Affidavit of Indigency by Tessa Luecke. (ARJ) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick.
November 3, 2021 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Stephen Toner, Rachel Batten, Shevaun Harris, Jennifer Frericks Terminating Florida Department of Children and Families and Florida Fifth District Court of Appeals filed by Tessa Luecke.(ARJ)
October 15, 2021 Set deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 11/3/2021 (ARJ)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Motion (Doc. 2) is DENIED without prejudice; The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; On or before November 3, 2021, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint and shall comply with the instructions in this Order. Failure to comply with the requirements in this Order may result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed without further warning. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to Plaintiff by regular mail. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 10/14/2021. (RN)
October 6, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Tessa Luecke. (ARJ) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick.
October 6, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants and Request for Preliminary Injunction filed by Tessa Luecke.(ARJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luecke v. Florida Department of Children and Families et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tessa Luecke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Department of Children and Families
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Toner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Fifth District Court of Appeals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rachel Batten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shevaun Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Frericks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?