Thibault et al v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
| Danny A. Thibault and Gisele B. Pires |
| Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 6:2021cv01692 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anne C Conway |
| Leslie R Hoffman |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 12/8/2021. (Conway, Anne)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Gisele B. Pires, Danny A. Thibault (Stoller, David) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Gisele B. Pires, Danny A. Thibault. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit proof of service)(Stoller, David) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Gisele B. Pires, Danny A. Thibault. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security served on 10/19/2021, answer due 12/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Summons Executed)(Stoller, David) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by Gisele B. Pires, Danny A. Thibault. Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 10/20/2021, answer due 12/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Summons Executed)(Stoller, David) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants. (No summons received for U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General.) (RDO) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Interested persons order by Gisele B. Pires, Danny A. Thibault. (Stoller, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Gisele B. Pires, Danny A. Thibault. Related case(s): Yes (Stoller, David) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL CASE ORDER - Notice of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Parties have 14 days from the date of this order to file their disclosure statement (if not already filed) and to notify the court of a related action (not required if there are no related actions). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 10/12/2021. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Anne C. Conway and Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. New case number: 6:21-cv-1692-ACC-LRH. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18802574) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Signed Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #4 Exhibit Interview Notice, #5 Exhibit Web Portal information re I-130, #6 Exhibit Web Portal information re I-485, #7 Exhibit NOID, #8 Exhibit Processing times, #9 Exhibit How to Read Processing times)(Stoller, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
