Stephens v. Jacobson et al
| David Terence Stephens |
| Amanda Regina Jacobson, Michael Howard LaFay and Robert Wattles |
| 6:2021cv01800 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Leslie R Hoffman |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to the Court by David Terence Stephens (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(SPM) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by David Terence Stephens. (SPM) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Exhibit by David Terence Stephens re #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SPM) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of inquiry by David Terence Stephens re #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SPM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by David Terence Stephens. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Account Stmt.)(SPM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amanda Regina Jacobson, Michael Howard LaFay, Robert Wattles filed by David Terence Stephens. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Mailing Envelope)(SPM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
