Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Shandolyn Reid |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 6:2021cv01987 |
| November 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Gregory J Kelly |
| G Kendall Sharp |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PROOF of service as to the Office of the Attorney General by Shandolyn Reid (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return Receipt-Attorney General)(Zadel, Bartholomew) Modified text on 1/20/2022 (ARJ). |
| Filing 11 PROOF of service as to Office of Regional Counsel by Shandolyn Reid (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return Receipt - Regional Chief Counsel)(Zadel, Bartholomew) Modified text on 1/20/2022 (ARJ). |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed by Shandolyn Reid. Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/10/2022, answer due 3/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return Receipt - US Attorney)(Zadel, Bartholomew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Nadine Elder on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Elder, Nadine) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Shandolyn Reid. (Zadel, Bartholomew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Shandolyn Reid. Related case(s): Yes (Zadel, Bartholomew) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BD) |
Filing 5
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (BD)
|
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER: Parties have 14 days from the date of this Order to file their Disclosure Statement (if not already filed) and, additionally to notify the Court of a related action by filing a Notice of Related Action, Local Rule 1.07(c), that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District of Florida or elsewhere (not required if there are no related actions). Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 11/24/2021. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (copies mailed/emailed) (AKC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:21-cv-1987-GKS-GJK. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18964449) filed by Shandolyn Reid. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Attorney General, #4 Proposed Summons Regional Chief Counsel, #5 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney)(Zadel, Bartholomew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
