Acevedo v. Wal-Mart Stores East
Jelitza J Acevedo and Jelitza J. Acevedo |
WAL-MART STORES EAST and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP |
6:2021cv02137 |
December 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Anne C Conway |
Leslie Hoffman Price |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER REMANDING CASE to the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit of Orange County and close the case - re #7 Notice (Other) filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 1/14/2022. (counsel mailed/emailed)(AKC) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Notice of Removal by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP re #1 Notice of Removal (Barry, Richard) Modified text on 1/13/2022 (TNP). |
Filing 6 ORDER to show cause as to Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. as to why the case should not be remanded for failure to adequately plead diversity of citizenship and the requisite amount in controversy to support federal subject matter jurisdiction. Response due by 1/13/2022. Plaintiff may file a motion to remand by 1/20/22. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 12/29/2021. (copies mailed/emailed)(AKC) Modified on 1/3/2022 to correct date(AKC). |
Filing 5 ORDER for Natalie Jones to comply with the administrative procedures regarding electronic filing within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 12/22/2021. (copy mailed)(AKC) |
Filing 4 INITIAL CASE ORDER for both Plaintiff and Defendant - Notice of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Parties have 14 days from the date of this order to file their disclosure statement (if not already filed) and to notify the court of a related action (not required if there are no related actions). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 12/22/2021. (copies mailed/emailed)(AKC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel Natalie Renee Jones of Local Rule 2.01(a), which requires membership or special admission in the Middle District bar to practice in the Middle District, except for the limited exceptions identified in the Rule. To apply for membership in the Middle District, visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Anne C. Conway and Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. New case number: 6:21-cv-2137-ACC-LRH. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit, case number 2021-ca-007660 filed in State Court on 11/21/2021. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19053210 filed by Wal-Mart Stores East. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Answer, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dean, Leslie) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/22/2021: #6 State Court Other Documents) (BD). Modified on 12/22/2021 to correct docket and reattached State Court Other Documents PDF with right-side up pages (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.