Dodge et al v. Lee et al
Andrew S. Dodge and Danelle L. Dodge |
Laurel M. Lee, Ashley Moody and Lori Scott |
6:2022cv00221 |
February 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Wendy W Berger |
Daniel C Irick |
Civil Rights: Voting |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Decision on Motions to Dismiss by All Defendants. (Schreiber, Charles) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 First MOTION to Dismiss Complaint, #13 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint, #16 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Andrew S. Dodge, Danelle L. Dodge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(BD) |
Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Andrew S. Dodge, Danelle L. Dodge. (BD) |
Filing 17 SUPPLEMENTAL Rule 3.01(g) Certification re #15 First MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Lori Scott. (Moskowitz, Deborah) Modified on 3/4/2022 (KNC). |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint , MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Laurel M. Lee. (Davis, Ashley) |
Filing 15 First MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Lori Scott. (Moskowitz, Deborah) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Lori Scott identifying Corporate Parent Brevard County Supervisor of Elections for Lori Scott. (Moskowitz, Deborah) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Ashley Moody. (Schreiber, Charles) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Ashley Moody identifying Corporate Parent Lori Scott, Corporate Parent Ashley Moody, Corporate Parent Laurel M. Lee, Corporate Parent Andrew S. Dodge, Corporate Parent Danelle L. Dodge for Ashley Moody. (Schreiber, Charles) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles J. F. Schreiber, Jr on behalf of Ashley Moody (Schreiber, Charles) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Deborah Lynn Moskowitz on behalf of Lori Scott (Moskowitz, Deborah) Modified on 2/24/2022 (removed duplicate text) (KNC). |
Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 2/8/2022 as to Lori Scott. (KNC) |
Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 2/9/2022 as to Laurel M. Lee. (KNC) |
Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on 2/9/2022 as to Ashley Moody. (KNC) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ashley E. Davis on behalf of Laurel M. Lee (Davis, Ashley) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ALL) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants. (LDJ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Request for Injunction against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ORL012239) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-6, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LDJ) Modified text on 2/4/2022 (LDJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.