Bragg et al v. Marriott International, Inc.
| Carolina Bragg, Juan Perozo, Borislava Raynova, Catherine Throneburg and Ivan Millan |
| Marriott International, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv00265 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #8 Order pdf by Ivan Millan. (Bolanovich, John)
|
|
Filing 12
ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #8 Order pdf by Borislava Raynova. (Bolanovich, John)
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #8 Order pdf by Juan Perozo. (Bolanovich, John)
|
|
Filing 10
ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #8 Order pdf by Catherine Throneburg. (Bolanovich, John)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to Court Interrogatories by Carolina Bragg re #8 Order pdf (Bolanovich, John) Modified on 4/6/2022 (matched text to pleading) (KNC).
|
|
Set deadlines: Answer to court interrogatories due by 4/5/2022; Case management report due by 5/30/2022 (KNC)
|
|
Filing 8
FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 2/22/2022. (IRM)
|
|
Filing 7
Defendant's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Marriott International, Inc..(Jones, Cullan)
|
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant may have until and through February 21, 2022, to respond to the Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 2/15/2022. (Kidd, Embry)
|
|
Reset deadlines: for Marriott International, Inc. Response to the Amended Complaint due 2/21/2022. (KNC)
|
|
Filing 5
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint by Marriott International, Inc.. (Jones, Cullan) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd.
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 2/10/2022. (ALL) ctp
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 2/9/2022. (ALL)
|
|
Filing 2
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-0265-WWB-EJK. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, case number 2022-CA-000163-O filed in State Court on January 6, 2022. (Filing Fee$ 402, Receipt #AFLMDC-19206771) filed by Marriott International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court File, #3 Exhibit C - Defendant's Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Cullan) Modified on 2/8/2022 to correct docket text(SJB). Modified on 2/8/2022 to correct docket text (BD).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
