Ruales v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Plaintiff: Patricio Ruales
Defendant: First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2022cv00301
Filed: February 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy B Dalton
Referring Judge: Gregory J Kelly
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2022 Filing 20 Remark: Doc. #14 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/23/2022 (EP)
February 23, 2022 Set deadline: Status Report due by 4/25/2022. (LDJ)
February 23, 2022 Case Stayed. (LDJ)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 Motion to Stay. On Monday, April 25, 2022, and every sixty days thereafter, Defendant is DIRECTED to provide a status report to the Court regarding Hunstein. Defendant must immediately notify the Court upon final decision of Hunstein. The Clerk is DIRECTED to administratively close the file.. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/23/2022. (YG)
February 22, 2022 Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION to Stay by First National Collection Bureau, Inc.. (Spengler, Sangeeta)
February 22, 2022 Filing 17 Remark: Doc. #12 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/22/2022 (EP)
February 22, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Thomas John Patti, III on behalf of Patricio Ruales. Lead Counsel: Thomas J. Patti, Esq.. (Patti, Thomas)
February 22, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Patricio Ruales. Related case(s): Yes (Patti, Thomas) Modified text on 2/23/2022 (LDJ).
February 22, 2022 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Patricio Ruales. (Patti, Thomas)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/22/2022. (YG)
February 18, 2022 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Order pdf by First National Collection Bureau, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent First National Collection Bureau Inc for First National Collection Bureau, Inc.. (Spengler, Sangeeta)
February 17, 2022 Filing 11 Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim No Opposition by First National Collection Bureau, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit license)(Spengler, Sangeeta)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #9) for lack of Local Rule 3.01(g) certification. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/17/2022. (EP)
February 16, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as to Count 2 by First National Collection Bureau, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 license)(Spengler, Sangeeta)
February 16, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by First National Collection Bureau, Inc..(Spengler, Sangeeta)
February 14, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Sangeeta P. Spengler on behalf of First National Collection Bureau, Inc.. Lead Counsel: Sangeeta Spengler. (Spengler, Sangeeta)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Standing Discovery Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 2/14/2022. (CRC)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/11/2022. (YG)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER re Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/11/2022. (YG)
February 10, 2022 Filing 3 ***CLERK ENTERED IN ERROR*** NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) Modified on 2/10/2022 to edit text and regenerated NEF (BD).
February 10, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:22-cv-301-RBD-GJK. (LMW)
February 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court Osceola County, case number 2022-CC-0065-CL filed in State Court on 01/07/2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19220976 filed by First National Collection Bureau, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Other Documents State Court Summons, #3 State Court Complaint, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 State Court Other Documents State Court Notice of Removal)(Golden, Dale) Modified on 2/10/2022 to correct docket textg (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruales v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricio Ruales
Represented By: Jibrael S. Hindi
Represented By: Thomas John Patti, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Represented By: Dale Thomas Golden
Represented By: Sangeeta P. Spengler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?