Hoyt v. Laxmi Augusta National Hotel, LTD
Janet Hoyt |
Laxmi Augusta National Hotel, LTD |
6:2022cv00383 |
February 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Wendy W Berger |
Embry J Kidd |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS returned unexecuted on 03/14/2022 by Janet Hoyt as to Laxmi Augusta National Hotel, LTD. (Arias, Jonathan) Modified on 3/15/2022 (matched text to pleading. Summons was not served) (KNC). |
Filing 8 ANSWER to court interrogatories by Janet Hoyt. (Arias, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Laxmi Augusta National Hotel, LTD filed by Janet Hoyt.(Arias, Jonathan) |
Set deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 3/11/2022 (KNC) |
Filing 6 ORDER. The Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before March 11, 2022, to correct the deficiencies noted herein. Failure to timely file an amended pleading in compliance with this Order may result in dismissal without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 2/28/2022. (ALL) |
Filing 5 ADA SCHEDULING ORDER. Status Conference set for 9/13/2022 at 10:00 AM in Orlando Courtroom 3 B before Judge Wendy W. Berger. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 2/24/2022. (ALL) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Laxmi Augusta National Hotel, LTD. (BD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 2/22/2022. (ALL) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-0383-WWB-EJK. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Laxmi Augusta National Hotel, LTD (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19259770) filed by Janet Hoyt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Supplement Notice of Appearance)(Arias, Jonathan) Modified on 2/22/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hoyt v. Laxmi Augusta National Hotel, LTD | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Janet Hoyt | |
Represented By: | Ariel Lett |
Represented By: | Jonathan Arias |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Laxmi Augusta National Hotel, LTD | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.