Stinnett v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
| Venus Stinnett |
| Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 6:2022cv00431 |
| February 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Gregory J Kelly |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 SUMMONS issued as to Delta Air Lines, Inc. (KNC) (KNC). |
| Filing 17 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Venus Stinnett. (Attachments: #1 USM 285)(BD) |
Filing 16
ORDER re #13 The Clerk of this Court shall mail summonses and Marshal 285 forms to Plaintiff for completion and return to the Court within fifteen (15) days of mailing. The Clerk is directed to provide the completed forms to the United States Marshal. Upon receipt of the completed forms, the United States Marshal is directed to serve them upon the Defendant without cost to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 4/5/2022. (CRC)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER. Standing Discovery Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 4/5/2022. (CRC)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER denying #12 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY. It is ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 3/23/2022. (CRC)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER terminating #5 Report and Recommendations.; granting #10 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; denying as moot #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. It is ORDERED that: 1.The original Application (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED, and the Report and Recommendation issued by the undersigned (Doc. No. 5) is terminated as moot; and 2. The Renewed Application (Doc. No. 10) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 3/23/2022. (CRC)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Permission to File Electronically by Venus Stinnett. (BD) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #7 MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC ACCESS. It is ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. Plaintiff only has permission to receive notice electronically of filings via CM/ECF and must submit her filings through the e-portal; the Clerk is therefore DIRECTED to add Plaintiff's email address to the docket; 2. In all other respects, the Motion (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED; and 3. The Notice (Doc. No. 8) is STRICKEN as moot and the Clerk is DIRECTED to delete the document and its attachment from the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 3/11/2022. (CRC)
|
| Filing 10 RENEWED MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Venus Stinnett. (BD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Delta Air Lines, Inc. with Jury Demand. Terminating Does 1-10 filed by Venus Stinnett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1 - 7)(BD) |
| Filing 8 **STRICKEN AND REMOVED PER #11 ORDER** NOTICE of Filing by Venus Stinnett re #7 MOTION Electronic Access (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(BD) Modified on 3/14/2022 (KNC). |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Electronic Access by Venus Stinnett. (BD) |
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Venus Stinnett. It is RECOMMENDED that the Court: 1. DENY the Application (Doc. No. 2); 2. DISMISS the Complaint; and 3. Grant Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within fourteen days of any order adopting this Report and Recommendation, accompanied a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis, with the warning that failure to file an amended complaint within the time permitted by the Court will result in dismissal of the case without further notice. See Order for additional details and duties. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 3/2/2022. (CRC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ALL) |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 3/1/2022. (ALL)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Venus Stinnett. (BD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Delta Air Lines, Inc., Does 1-10 with Jury Demand filed by Venus Stinnett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Summons)(BD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
