United States of America v. $46,260 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| $46,260 in U.S. Currency |
| 6:2022cv00434 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PROOF of publication filed by United States of America. Newspaper: an official government internet site, (www.forfeiture.gov) Date(s) of publication for at least 30 consecutive days, beginning March 20, 2022 and ending on April 18, 2022. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1)(Andrejko, Nicole) |
| Filing 11 PROOF of service by United States of America (Andrejko, Nicole) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #2 United States' Motion for Issuance of Warrant of Arrest In Rem. Pursuant to Rule G(3)(b)(i), Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue the attached Warrant of Arrest In Rem (Doc. 2-1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 3/28/2022. (TYI)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against $46,260 in U.S. Currency filed by United States of America.(Andrejko, Nicole) Modified on 3/21/2022 (matched text to pleading) (KNC). |
| Filing 7 AMENDED Complaint by United States of America. Amendment to #6 Amended document . (Andrejko, Nicole) Modified on 3/21/2022 (KNC). |
| Filing 6 AMENDED Complaint by United States of America. Amendment to #1 Complaint . (Andrejko, Nicole) Modified on 3/21/2022 (KNC). |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order by United States of America. (Andrejko, Nicole) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 3/4/2022. (DS)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by United States of America. Related case(s): No (KNC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant In Rem by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Warrant of Arrest In Rem)(KNC) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. |
| Filing 1 Verified COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against $46,260 in U.S. Currency filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. $46,260 in U.S. Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | James A. Muench |
| Represented By: | Nicole M. Andrejko |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: $46,260 in U.S. Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
