Ruales v. Credit Corp. Solutions Inc.
| Patricio Ruales |
| Credit Corp. Solutions, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv00450 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Stayed. (LDJ) |
| Set deadline: Status Report due by 5/9/2022. (LDJ) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Stay. On Monday, May 9, 2022, and every sixty days thereafter, Defendant is DIRECTED to provide a status report to the Court regarding Hunstein. Defendant must immediately notify the Court on final decision of Hunstein. The Clerk is DIRECTED to administratively close the file.. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/9/2022. (YG)
|
| Filing 7 Remark: Doc. #5 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/9/2022. (EP) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Pending En Banc Ruling re #1 Notice of Removal , Unopposed MOTION for 14-Day Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal if Motion to Stay is Denied by Credit Corp. Solutions, Inc. (Robert, Seth) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. Modified text on 3/8/2022 (LDJ). |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order pdf by Credit Corp. Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Credit Corp. Facilities Pty Limited for Credit Corp. Solutions, Inc.. (Robert, Seth) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER re Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/7/2022. (YG)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 3/4/2022. (PML) ctp
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-0450-RBD-EJK. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court of the 9th Judicial Circuit in and for Osceola County, Florida, case number 2021CC004363CL filed in State Court on 12/17/2021. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19295355 filed by Credit Corp. Solutions Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Robert, Seth) Modified on 3/3/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruales v. Credit Corp. Solutions Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricio Ruales | |
| Represented By: | Jibrael S. Hindi |
| Represented By: | Thomas John Patti, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Credit Corp. Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Connis O. Brown, III |
| Represented By: | Seth P. Robert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
