Ramos Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Jose Luis Ramos Sanchez |
| Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 6:2022cv00467 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Gregory J Kelly |
| Laura Lothman Lambert |
| G Kendall Sharp |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Remark: Docs. #7, #9 have been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 4/4/2022. (EP) |
| Filing 11 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Laura Lothman Lambert. New case number: 6:22-cv-0467-RBD-LLL. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly no longer assigned to the case. (SJB) |
| Filing 10 Case Reassigned to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. New case number: 6:22-cv-00467-RBD-GJK. Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp no longer assigned to the case. (APV) |
| Filing 9 Disclosure Statement re #5 Order by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) Modified on 3/21/2022 (SPM). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jose Luis Ramos Sanchez. Related case(s): Yes (Zadel, Bartholomew) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Jose Luis Ramos Sanchez. (Zadel, Bartholomew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nadine Elder on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Elder, Nadine) |
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER: Parties have 14 days from the date of this Order to file their Disclosure Statement (if not already filed) and, additionally to notify the Court of a related action by filing a Notice of Related Action, Local Rule 1.07(c), that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District of Florida or elsewhere (not required if there are no related actions). Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 3/7/2022. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (copies mailed/emailed) (AKC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases, 3:21-mc-1-TJC, Doc. #43. (BD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:22-cv-0467-GKS-GJK. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19304295) filed by Jose Luis Ramos Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Attorney General, #4 Proposed Summons Regional Chief Counsel, #5 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney)(Zadel, Bartholomew) Modified on 3/7/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
