Roth v. Waste Pro USA, Inc.
| Andrew Roth |
| Waste Pro USA, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv00505 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Waste Pro USA, Inc.. Related case(s): No (Tingley, Amy) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Order by Waste Pro USA, Inc.. (Tingley, Amy) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy S. Tingley on behalf of Waste Pro USA, Inc. (Tingley, Amy) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Paul M. Botros on behalf of Andrew Roth. Lead Counsel: Paul M. Botros, Esq.. (Botros, Paul) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Order by Andrew Roth. (Botros, Paul) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Andrew Roth. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Botros, Paul) |
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 3/18/2022. (MEH) ctp
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 3/18/2022. (MEH) ctp
|
| Filing 4 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:22-cv-505-CEM-DCI. Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd no longer assigned to the case. (NAS) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER transferring case to U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick, with his consent, pursuant to Local Rule 1.07(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 3/10/2022.(CB)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-0505-CEM-EJK. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Waste Pro USA, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19322330) filed by Andrew Roth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Botros, Paul) Modified on 3/10/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roth v. Waste Pro USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew Roth | |
| Represented By: | Paul M. Botros |
| Represented By: | C. Ryan Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Waste Pro USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Amy S. Tingley |
| Represented By: | Matthew Justin Pearce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
