Liu et al v. Ohio Security Insurance Company
| Che Chi Liu and Shao-Lan Liu |
| Ohio Security Insurance Company |
| 6:2022cv00583 |
| March 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Jones, Paul) |
Filing 24
ENDORSED ORDER granting in part and denying in part #19 Motion for Extension of Time. The parties are DIRECTED to conduct their case management conference on or before May 19, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 5/5/2022. (CB)
|
|
Filing 23
ENDORSED ORDER vacating the May 4, 2022 Endorsed Order 22. The Joint Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel #20 and the Consent for Substitution of Counsel #21 shall be construed as a Notice of Appearance for counsel Gary J. Spahn, in light of the granted Motion to Withdraw #17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 5/5/2022. (CB)
|
|
Filing 22
(VACATED per Endorsed Order 23) ENDORSED ORDER striking #20 Joint Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel and #21 Consent for Substitution of Counsel. Attorneys wishing to withdraw as counsel are not permitted to a file a stipulation with the Court, but must instead file a motion containing representations that comply with Local Rule 2.02(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 5/4/2022. (CB) Modified text on 5/6/2022 (LDJ).
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE/Consent for Substitution of Counsel by Che Chi Liu, Shao-Lan Liu re #20 Stipulation (Spahn, Gary) Modified text on 5/3/2022 (LDJ). Modified text on 5/4/2022 (LDJ). Modified text on 5/6/2022 (LDJ). |
| Filing 20 STIPULATION of Counsel by Che Chi Liu, Shao-Lan Liu. (Spahn, Gary) Modified text on 5/4/2022 (LDJ). Modified text on 5/6/2022 (LDJ). |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time until 6/6/22 to File Uniform Case Management Report and Notice of Efforts to Comply with Deadline for Case Management Conference by Ohio Security Insurance Company. (Jones, Paul) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. Modified text on 5/2/2022 (LDJ). |
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #17 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorneys Leslie M. Coulter and Rick L. Martindale are terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 4/27/2022. (CB)
|
| Filing 17 Second MOTION for Rick L. Martindale, Esq. to Withdraw as Attorney for Plaintiffs by Che Chi Liu, Shao-Lan Liu. (Martindale, Rick) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
| Filing 16 Remark: Docs. #9, #11 have been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 4/4/2022. (EP) |
|
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER DISCHARGING the Order to Show Cause (Doc. #7) in light of Defendant's Response (Doc. #14). Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 4/7/2022. (EP)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Ohio Security Insurance Company. (Jones, Paul) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER denying without prejudice #10 and #12 Motions to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 4/4/2022. (CB)
|
| Filing 12 First MOTION for Leslie M. Coulter, Esq. to Withdraw as Attorney for Plaintiffs by All Plaintiffs. (Martindale, Rick) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by All Plaintiffs. (Martindale, Rick) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. Modified text on 4/4/2022 (LDJ). |
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Rick L. Martindale, Esq. to Withdraw as Attorney for Plaintiffs by All Plaintiffs. (Martindale, Rick) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Ohio Security Insurance Company. (Jones, Paul) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ohio Security Insurance Company.(Jones, Paul) |
| Set deadlines: Defendant's Show Cause Response due by 4/7/2022 (KNC) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Thursday, April 7, 2022, Defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by written response why this case should not be remanded due to deficient citizenship allegations. The response must be supported by evidence, which may be in the form of an affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury. Failure to timely and adequately respond may result in this action being remanded. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/23/2022. (YG)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 3/23/2022. (PML) ctp
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER re Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/22/2022. (YG)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Pablo Caceres on behalf of Ohio Security Insurance Company (Caceres, J.) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel Leslie Marie Coulter of Local Rule 2.01(b)(1)(G), which requires members of the Middle District bar to register with the Middle District CM/ECF system by submitting an e-file registration through PACER. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-0583-RBD-EJK. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Civil Orange County, case number 2022ca530 filed in State Court on 01/19/2022. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-19368341 filed by Ohio Security Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
