Marc Irwin Sharfman M.D. P.A. v. Precision Imaging St. Augustine LLC et al
| Marc Irwin Sharfman M.D. P.A. |
| Precision Imaging St. Augustine LLC, Halo DX, Inc. and Halo Diagnostics Bulgaria, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv00642 |
| March 31, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Seminole County Florida, case number 2022CA000423 filed in State Court on 02/24/2022. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-19409761 filed by Halo Diagnostics Bulgaria, Inc., Halo DX, Inc., Precision Imaging St. Augustine LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 State Court Other Documents Exhibit B-Summons on Halo Diagnostics Bulgaria Inc., #3 State Court Other Documents Exhibit C-Summons for Precision Imaging St. Augustine, #4 State Court Other Documents Exhibit D-Verified Return of Service for Precision Imaging, #5 State Court Other Documents Exhibit E-Summons for Halo DX Inc., #6 State Court Other Documents Exhibit F-Verified Return of Service for Halo DX Inc., #7 State Court Other Documents Exhibit G-Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 State Court Docket Sheet)(La Bouef, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
