Espada v. Caremark, LLC
Lanesha Espada |
Caremark, LLC doing business as CVS |
6:2022cv00737 |
April 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Gregory J Kelly |
Gregory J Kelly |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER granting #9 Joint Motion to Remand. This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, Case Number 2022-CA-001420-O. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 5/5/2022. (EET) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Remand to State Court by Caremark, LLC. (Travers, Jessica) |
Set deadlines: for Caremark, LLC. Answer due by 5/6/2022. (SPM) |
Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response / Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 4/23/2022. (Baker, David) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to May 6, 2022, to File Response/Reply to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint by Caremark, LLC. (Rivera, Kimberly) Modified on 4/22/2022 (SPM). Modified on 4/22/2022 (SPM). |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Order by Caremark, LLC identifying Corporate Parent CVS Pharmacy, Inc. for Caremark, LLC. (Travers, Jessica) Modified on 4/19/2022 (SPM). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Caremark, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Travers, Jessica) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/18/2022. (MEH) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/18/2022. (MEH) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:22-cv-0737-CEM-GJK. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 9th Judicial Circuit of Orange County Court, case number 22-ca-001420-O filed in State Court on 03-14-2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19466697 filed by Caremark, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C)(Travers, Jessica) Modified on 4/15/2022 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Espada v. Caremark, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lanesha Espada | |
Represented By: | Luis A. Cabassa |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Caremark, LLC doing business as CVS | |
Represented By: | Jessica Theresa Travers |
Represented By: | Kimberly Rivera |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.