Vu v. Tynda Holdings, LLC
Phuong Vu |
Tynda Holdings, LLC d/b/a Victory Casino Cruises and Tynda Holdings, LLC doing business as Victory Casino Cruises |
6:2022cv00771 |
April 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Wendy W Berger |
Daniel C Irick |
Marine |
46 U.S.C. ยง 0688 Jones Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration #2 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall submit all claims to binding arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Agreement. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 6/14/2022. (RMF) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Agreed Order by Phuong Vu re #2 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration with Supporting Memorandum of Law (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Finklehoffe, Carol) Modified on 5/23/2022 (KNC). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing State Court Docket Sheet by Tynda Holdings, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet)(Cardelle, Stephanie) Modified on 5/2/2022 (KNC). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 4/27/2022. (RMF) |
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:22-cv-0771-WWB-DCI. (SJB) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration with Supporting Memorandum of Law by Tynda Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint)(Cardelle, Stephanie) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/22/2022: #2 Exhibit Employment Agreement) (BD). Modified on 4/22/2022 to correct docket text and attachment (BD). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 18th Circuit Court Brevard County, case number 052022 CA 016836 filed in State Court on February 2, 2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-19487761 filed by Tynda Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit State Court Docket, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil)(Cardelle, Stephanie) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/22/2022: #5 Exhibit Employment Agreement) (BD). Modified on 4/22/2022 to correct docket text and attachment (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.