Tucker v. Naymick et al
Plaintiff: Renwick L. Tucker
Defendant: Brett Naymick and Unknown Named Officers
Case Number: 6:2022cv00789
Filed: April 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Paul G Byron
Referring Judge: Gregory J Kelly
2 Judge: Gregory J Kelly
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2022 Filing 5 JUDGMENT. This case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (RDO)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice and close the case. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/23/2022. (GNB)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall amend his complaint within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to fully comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice without further notice. Plaintiff must submit a consent form indicating his understanding that he is required to pay the full filing fee in this case, even if his motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and shall immediately advise the Court of any change of address. Within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date on this Order, Plaintiff shall either file a fully completed Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate (if Plaintiff desires to proceed as a pauper) or pay the $402.00 filing fee (if Plaintiff does not wish to proceed as a pauper). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a standard civil rights complaint form and a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate along with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 4/28/2022. (DS)
April 25, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Renwick L. Tucker. (RDO) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly.
April 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Renwick L. Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(RDO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2022: #2 Attachment) (RDO).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tucker v. Naymick et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Renwick L. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brett Naymick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Named Officers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?