Shinn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
Lavon R. Shinn |
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida |
6:2022cv00956 |
June 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
David A Baker |
Roy B Dalton |
Gregory J Kelly |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Lavon R. Shinn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(LDJ) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge David A. Baker. |
Filing 3 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Baker. New case number: 6:22-cv-956-RBD-DAB. US Magistrate Judge Gregory J Kelly no longer assigned to the case. (LMW) |
Filing 2 ORDER that Petitioner must submit both a fully completed Affidavit of Indigency and a computer printout or declared statement that contains all the transactions in his prisoner account for the period from March 8, 2022, through June 8, 2022. The failure to do so within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of this order will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 6/10/2022. (DS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lavon R. Shinn. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (no fee payment or IFP motion)(LDJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.