Lopez et al v. State of Florida et al
| Victor G. Lopez and Celeste Farias |
| State of Florida, Michelle Naberhaus, Michelle A. Deleon, Quintairos, Prieto, Wood and Boyer, PA, U.S. Bank Trust National Association and Tyler E. Messler |
| 6:2022cv00998 |
| June 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Quintairos, Prieto, Wood and Boyer, PA. (Bodnieks, Lars) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss, Motion to Quash Service of Process and Special Appearance by Quintairos, Prieto, Wood and Boyer, PA. (Bodnieks, Lars) Modified on 7/29/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss, Motion to Quash Service of Process and Special Appearance by Michelle A. Deleon. (Bodnieks, Lars) Modified on 7/29/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). |
Filing 7
ORDER denying without prejudice #4 Non-Judicial Temporary Restraining Order - Permanent Injunction & Demand for An Emergency Hearing Due to the Pending 10-Million-Dollar Claim Under 42 U.S. Code Sec. 1983 Action for Deprivation of Civil Rights. See PDF for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 7/15/2022. (BAB)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Michelle A. Deleon, Tyler E. Messler, Michelle Naberhaus, Quintairos, Prieto, Wood and Boyer, PA, U.S. Bank Trust National Association. (KNC) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand. filed by All Plaintiffs.(KNC) (KNC). |
| Filing 4 Emergency MOTION for Permanent Injunction and Demand for Emergency Hearing by Celeste Farias, Victor G. Lopez. (KNC) |
| FEES Paid by Celeste Farias (Filing fee $402.00, Receipt Number ORL104832). (SRD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
|
Filing 2
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 6/8/2022. (RMF)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Victor G. Lopez, Celeste Farias. (Filing fee not paid. No IFP)(BD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
