Castaneda v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Leesa Castaneda |
Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., American Regent, Inc.., Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo US Holdings, Inc., Vifor (International) Ag and American Regent, Inc. |
6:2022cv01141 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Embry J Kidd |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 8/19/2022. (CB) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Michael G. Daly to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-19899630 for $150 by Leesa Castaneda. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Act as Local Counsel, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Mitzman, Jordyn) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 8/18/2022. (CB) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Joshua M. Neuman to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-19896849 for $150 by Leesa Castaneda. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Act as Local Counsel, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Mitzman, Jordyn) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand. filed by All Plaintiffs.(Mitzman, Jordyn) |
Filing 9 It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that on or before July 26, 2022, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE as to why this case should not be dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 7/12/2022. (ALL) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS issued as to Daiichi Sankyo US Holdings, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor (International) Ag. (SPM) |
Filing 7 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Leesa Castaneda. (Mitzman, Jordyn) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to American Regent, Inc. (SPM) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 7/1/2022. (ALL) |
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 7/1/2022. (ALL) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel Michael G. Daly and Joshua M. Neuman Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper; Pay the Special Admission Fee; Submit a Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration through PACER. Visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers for details (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SPM) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-1141-CEM-EJK. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Regent, Inc.., Daiichi Sankyo US Holdings, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vifor (International) Ag with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19728156) filed by Leesa Castaneda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Mitzman, Jordyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.