Kemp v. Zuckerburg
| Bobby M. Kemp |
| Mark Zuckerburg |
| 6:2022cv01220 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| David A Baker |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 2511 Wiretapping |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT in favor of Mark Zuckerburg against Bobby M. Kemp (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (KNC) |
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 and Motion to Amend #6 are DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 9/1/2022. (RMF)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Bobby M. Kemp. (KNC) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge David A. Baker. |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 7/25/2022. (RMF)
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER consent form and financial certificate by Bobby M. Kemp. (KNC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Bobby M. Kemp. (Attachments: #1 Resident Transaction Details)(KNC) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge David A. Baker. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Zuckerburg filed by Bobby M. Kemp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(KNC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kemp v. Zuckerburg | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bobby M. Kemp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mark Zuckerburg | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
