Morris v. Gaeta
| Nekia Morris |
| Joelle Gaeta |
| 6:2022cv01246 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER denying #11 Time Sensitive Motion for Court's Default. There is no indication that service has occurred in this case, so there is no legal basis for the request, and it violates the Local Rules of this Court. See Local Rule 1.08 and 3.01(a). Plaintiff is cautioned that further filings that fail to comply with the Local Rules may simply be stricken. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 8/22/2022. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 11 Time Sensitive MOTION for Clerk's Default against Joelle Gaeta by Nekia Morris. (Titled: Motion for Court's Default) (SPM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER denying #8 Time Sensitive Motion for Discovery. Discovery has not opened in this case, there is no legal basis for the request, and it violates the Local Rules of this Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(d)(1); Local Rule 1.08 and 3.01. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 8/3/2022. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 8 Time Sensitive MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically Discovery Motion by Nekia Morris. (SPM) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order by Nekia Morris. (SPM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Nekia Morris. Related case(s): Yes (SPM) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 7/18/2022. (ALL)
|
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 7/18/2022. (ALL)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 2/1/2021. (RN)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Nekia Morris. (SPM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joelle Gaeta filed by Nekia Morris. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter, #2 Exhibit State Court Doc., #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(SPM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morris v. Gaeta | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nekia Morris | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Joelle Gaeta | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
