Soblotney v. United States Air Force et al
| Harry Dale Soblotney |
| United States Air Force, Anastasia Club, Third Edition, Strategic Force, United States Air Force and Canada Minister |
| 6:2022cv01426 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| David A Baker |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #2 Order pdf by Harry Dale Soblotney. (not signed) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SRD) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Harry Dale Soblotney. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SRD) |
Filing 3
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/16/2022. (ALL)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/16/2022. (ALL)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee $402, receipt number ORL104749 filed by Harry Dale Soblotney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(SPM). Modified on 8/11/2022 (SPM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
