Pedroza v. Waldrop et al
Plaintiff: Chloe Pedroza
Defendant: Nathaniel Waldrop, Dixi Romero Ortiz, Waldrop Investment Group LLC, EM Investment LLC and Natixi Investments LLC
Case Number: 6:2022cv01445
Filed: August 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Embry J Kidd
Referring Judge: Carlos E Mendoza
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2022 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #8 Order by Chloe Pedroza. (Kayes, Thomas) Modified on 8/30/2022 (SPM).
August 29, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Thomas Kayes on behalf of Chloe Pedroza. Lead Counsel: Thomas R. Kayes. (Kayes, Thomas)
August 24, 2022 Filing 14 WAIVER of service returned executed on 08/22/2022 by Chloe Pedroza as to Waldrop Investment Group LLC. (Kayes, Thomas)
August 24, 2022 Filing 13 WAIVER of service returned executed on 08/22/2022 by Chloe Pedroza as to EM Investment LLC. (Kayes, Thomas)
August 24, 2022 Filing 12 WAIVER of service returned executed on 08/22/2022 by Chloe Pedroza as to Natixi Investments LLC. (Kayes, Thomas)
August 24, 2022 Filing 11 WAIVER of service returned executed on 08/22/2022 by Chloe Pedroza as to Dixi Romero Ortiz. (Kayes, Thomas)
August 24, 2022 Filing 10 WAIVER of service returned executed on 08/22/2022 by Chloe Pedroza as to Nathaniel Waldrop. (Kayes, Thomas)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/16/2022. (ALL)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/16/2022. (ALL)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 8/16/2022. (CB)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 8/16/2022. (CB)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 8/16/2022. (PML)
August 15, 2022 Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-1445-CEM-EJK. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 First MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. (SJB)
August 12, 2022 Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Thomas R. Kayes to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-19881008 for $150 by Chloe Pedroza. (Cardinal, Morgan)
August 12, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Chloe Pedroza. (Cardinal, Morgan) Modified on 8/15/2022 (SPM).
August 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EM Investment LLC, Natixi Investments LLC, Dixi Romero Ortiz, Nathaniel Waldrop, Waldrop Investment Group LLC with Jury Demand filed by Chloe Pedroza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cardinal, Morgan) Modified on 8/15/2022 (SPM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pedroza v. Waldrop et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chloe Pedroza
Represented By: Morgan Michele Cardinal
Represented By: Thomas Kayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathaniel Waldrop
Represented By: Daniel J Kavanaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dixi Romero Ortiz
Represented By: Daniel J Kavanaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Waldrop Investment Group LLC
Represented By: Daniel J Kavanaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EM Investment LLC
Represented By: Daniel J Kavanaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Natixi Investments LLC
Represented By: Daniel J Kavanaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?