Martinez et al v. United States of America
| Jennifer Martinez, Jose Martinez, Lionel Martinez and Jennifer Garcia-Martinez |
| United States of America |
| 6:2022cv01489 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| David A Baker |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Redacted Exhibit A by Jose Martinez re #3 Complaint (Navin, Bonita) Modified on 8/29/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). |
Filing 8
ORDER to Strike: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint #1, Proposed Summons (Doc. 1-2), and Exhibits (Doc. Nos. 1-3, 3-2) are STRICKEN. The Clerk is directed to strike and delete those documents from the record. Defendant may refile the Exhibit in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before August 29, 2022. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 8/24/2022. (RMF)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to U.S. Attorney. (KNC) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 8/23/2022. (TNP)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 8/23/2022. (RMF)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT for Medical Malpractice against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19914958) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 **STRICKEN AND REMOVED PER #8 ORDER** Exhibit, #3 Proposed Summons)(Navin, Bonita) Modified on 8/24/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). Modified on 8/25/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge David A. Baker. New case number: 6:22-cv-01489-WWB-DAB. (APV) |
| Filing 1 **STRICKEN AND REMOVED PER #8 ORDER** COMPLAINT For Medical Malpractice against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number BFLMDC-19907999) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proposed Summons, # 3 Exhibit)(Navin, Bonita) Modified on 8/25/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
