Cabrera Polanco v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
bilin antonio cabrera polanco |
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, O'Ruill D McCanlas, Chris Magnus and O'Ruill D. McCanlas |
6:2022cv01490 |
August 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Roy B Dalton |
Embry J Kidd |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of service by Bilin Antonio Cabrera Polanco . (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope certified mail receipts)(Perez, Henye) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Chris Magnus, O'Ruill D McCanlas, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (SRD) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED summons to be issued by bilin antonio cabrera polanco. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons)(Perez, Henye) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-01490-RBD-EJK. (APV) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLMDC-19908045) filed by Bilin Antonio Cabrera Polanco. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, Form I-551, Permanent Resident Card, #3 Exhibit 2, I-191 Approval Notice, #4 Exhibit 3, Order to Appear for Deferred Inspection)(Perez, Henye) Modified Text on 8/23/2022 (SRD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.