Harris v. Segal et al
| Arthur Vaughn Harris |
| Honorable Judge Robert Segal, Phil Archer and Clarissa Harrell |
| 6:2022cv01638 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration re #3 Order dismissing case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/25/2022. (MEH)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #3 Order dismissing case, by Arthur Vaughn Harris. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SPM) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SPM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing case for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and as frivolous. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2), enter judgment, and close the case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/20/2022. (MEH)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Arthur Vaughn Harris. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SRD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Arthur Vaughn Harris. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SRD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
