Hernandez Llerena v. United States Department of State et al
| Isvel Hernandez Llerena |
| United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy in Georgetown, Guyana, Antony Blinken, Sarah-Ann Lynch, United States Secretary of State and Ambassador of the United States at the U.S. Embassy in Georgetown, Guyana |
| 6:2022cv01671 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER dismissing case with prejudice re #11 Notice of voluntary dismissal. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close the file. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/9/2022. (ALL)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Isvel Hernandez Llerena (Schmidt, Katarina) |
| Filing 10 Remark: Doc. #9 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/6/2022. (EP) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement, 8 Order no pdf, #4 Order pdf, #1 Complaint (amended) by Isvel Hernandez Llerena. (Schmidt, Katarina) |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER TO STRIKE Plaintiff's Certificate of Interested Persons (Doc. 6) for failure to comply with the typography requirements under Local Rule 1.08(a). The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove (Doc. 6) from the docket and Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file an appropriate document by Monday, October 10, 2022. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/3/2022. (EP)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Isvel Hernandez Llerena. Related case(s): No (Schmidt, Katarina) |
| Filing 6 ***CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order pdf, #1 Complaint by Isvel Hernandez Llerena. (Schmidt, Katarina) ***DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ENTERED 10/3/2022 Modified on 10/4/2022 to strike the document as directed (RPB). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed by Isvel Hernandez Llerena. Ambassador of the United States at the U.S. Embassy in Georgetown, Guyana served on 9/22/2022, answer due 11/21/2022; U.S. Embassy in Georgetown, Guyana served on 9/22/2022, answer due 11/21/2022; United States Department of State served on 9/22/2022, answer due 11/21/2022; United States Secretary of State served on 9/22/2022, answer due 11/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Mail receipts)(Schmidt, Katarina) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 9/19/2022. (ALL)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (SRD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:22-cv-1671-RBD-DCI. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Secretary of State, U.S. Embassy in Georgetown, Guyana, United States Department of State, Ambassador of the United States at the U.S. Embassy in Georgetown, Guyana (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19993278) filed by Isvel Hernandez Llerena. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Garland, #3 Proposed Summons US Attorney, #4 Proposed Summons Ambassador, #5 Proposed Summons Blinken, #6 Proposed Summons Embassy, #7 Proposed Summons DOS)(Schmidt, Katarina) Modified on 9/15/2022 to edit docket text (SRD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
