Green v. Strowbridge et al
| Timothy Stephen Green, Tim Green and Timothy Green |
| Patricia L. Strowbridge, David Yau, Ashley Moody and Memori McClimans |
| 6:2022cv01802 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (LDJ) |
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 11/4/2022. (GNB)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Amended Information by Timothy Stephen Green re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Mailing Envelope)(LDJ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of change of address by Timothy Stephen Green (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SRD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Timothy Stephen Green. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(SRD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Timothy Stephen Green. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SRD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
