Reilly v. Evolus, Inc.
Erin Reilly |
Evolus, Inc. |
6:2022cv01982 |
October 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Wendy W Berger |
Embry J Kidd |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER dismissing case with prejudice re #15 Joint Notice of Settlement and Request for 60-Day Order. The Clerk is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 12/19/2022. (RMF) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of settlement and Request for 60-Day Order by Evolus, Inc. (Boyer, April) |
Reset deadlines: for Evolus, Inc. Answer to the Complaint due 12/19/2022. Case management report due by 12/19/2022 (KNC) |
Filing 14 ENDORSED ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant may have until and through December 19, 2022, to respond to the Complaint, and the parties may have until and through December 19, 2022, to file their case management report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 12/1/2022. (Kidd, Embry) |
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 12 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule #1 Notice of Removal, by Evolus, Inc. (Boyer, April) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. Modified on 12/1/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 11/3/2022. (RMF) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Erin Reilly. (Raslavich, Benjamin) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Erin Reilly. Related case(s): No (Raslavich, Benjamin) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Benjamin W. Raslavich on behalf of Erin Reilly. Lead Counsel: Benjamin W. Raslavich. (Raslavich, Benjamin) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Evolus, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Alphaeon 1 LLC, Other Affiliate Medytox, Inc. for Evolus, Inc. (Boyer, April) Modified on 11/3/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). |
Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Evolus, Inc., may have until and through December 5, 2022, to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 11/1/2022. (Kidd, Embry) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Evolus, Inc. (Boyer, April) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. Modified on 11/1/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). |
Filing 4 ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 10/31/2022. (PML) |
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-1982-WWB-EJK. (LMW) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by April Lynn Boyer on behalf of Evolus, Inc. (Boyer, April) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court - Volusia County, case number 2022-11515-CIDL filed in State Court on 9/19/2022. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-20139770 filed by Evolus, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyer, April) Modified on 10/28/2022 to edit docket text (KNC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Reilly v. Evolus, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Erin Reilly | |
Represented By: | Benjamin W. Raslavich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Evolus, Inc. | |
Represented By: | April Lynn Boyer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.