Cohan v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.
| Howard Cohan |
| Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Whole Foods Market Group Inc |
| 6:2022cv01987 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anne C Conway |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to court interrogatories by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Howard Cohan. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Howard Cohan. Related case(s): Yes (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of service executed on 11/4/2022 by Howard Cohan as to Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. (Sconzo, Gregory) Modified on 11/7/2022 to edit docket text (SRD). |
Filing 5
ADA SCHEDULING ORDER setting various deadlines. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 10/31/2022. (AKC)
|
|
Filing 4
INITIAL CASE ORDER (ADA case waiving CMR requirement) - Notice of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Parties have 14 days from the date of this order to file their disclosure statement (if not already filed) and to notify the court of a related action (not required if there are no related actions). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 10/31/2022. (AKC)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. (LMW) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Anne C. Conway and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:22-cv-1987-ACC-DCI. (LMW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20142526) filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steven Sconzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Whole Foods Market Group Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
