Engstrom et al v. United Airlines Master Executive Council et al
| James E. Engstrom and Richard Shaw |
| United Airlines Master Executive Council and Air Line Pilots Association, International |
| 6:2022cv02130 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| David A Baker |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
Filing 8
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 11/28/2022. (RMF)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Molly Kate Mullen on behalf of James E. Engstrom, Richard Shaw. Lead Counsel: Nathan A. McCoy. (Mullen, Molly) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Plaintiff's Counsel of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KNC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Molly Kate Mullen on behalf of James E. Engstrom, Richard Shaw (Mullen, Molly) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer on 11/17/2022. (JW)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel Molly Mullen of Local Rule 2.01(a), which requires membership or special admission in the Middle District bar to practice in the Middle District, except for the limited exceptions identified in the Rule. To apply for membership in the Middle District, visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KNC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge David A. Baker. New case number: 6:22-cv-2130-WWB-DAB. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT And Demand For Jury Trial against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20205532) filed by James E. Engstrom, Richard Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(McCoy, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
