Simpson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Ian Murray Simpson |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
6:2022cv02182 |
November 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Roy B Dalton |
Embry J Kidd |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ENDORSED ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The Commissioner may have until and through February 22, 2023, to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 1/20/2023. (Kidd, Embry) |
Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) |
Filing 16 Amended CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Order by Ian Murray Simpson. (Culbertson, Richard) Modified text on 12/9/2022 (TNP). |
Filing 15 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-2182-EJK. Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. no longer assigned to the case. (RN) |
Filing 14 ORDER approving consent to jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 12/6/2022. (ALL) |
Filing 13 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) |
Filing 12 ENDORSED ORDER TO STRIKE Defendant's Certificate of Interested Persons (Doc. 10). The filing fails to comply with the amended disclosure form, which went into effect December 1, 2022. https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/forms/all/civil-forms. The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove (Doc. 10) from the docket and Defendant is DIRECTED to file a compliant form by Tuesday, December 13, 2022. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 12/6/2022. (EP) |
Filing 11 CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) |
Filing 10 *STRICKEN and REMOVED per Order at Doc. 12, CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Order by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) Modified on 12/7/2022 (RN). |
Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to clarify why he believes there is a conflict of interest in this case in light of 6:22-cv-66-CEM-EJK. (See Doc. #6.) Plaintiff's response is due on Thursday, December 8, 2022, and must not exceed three pages. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 12/1/2022. (EP) |
Filing 8 Remark: Doc. #6 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/30/2022. (EP) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Ian Murray Simpson. Related case(s): No (Culbertson, Richard) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Order by Ian Murray Simpson. (Culbertson, Richard) |
Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/28/2022. (ALL) |
Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-2182-RBD-EJK. (SJB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Sarah Patience Jacobs on behalf of Ian Murray Simpson. Lead Counsel: Sarah P. Jacobs. (Jacobs, Sarah) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Patience Jacobs on behalf of Ian Murray Simpson (Jacobs, Sarah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20233704) filed by Ian Murray Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Culbertson, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.