Juarez v. United States Postal Service
Juan Juarez |
United States Postal Service |
6:2022cv02225 |
December 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Anne C Conway |
Embry J Kidd |
Motor Vehicle |
23 U.S.C. ยง 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Brian C. Lamb on behalf of Juan Juarez. Lead Counsel: Brian C Lamb. (Lamb, Brian) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian C. Lamb on behalf of Juan Juarez. (Lamb, Brian) Modified on 12/23/2022 to edit docket text(SRD). |
Filing 6 ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 12/5/2022. (JOR) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to counsel Brian C. Lamb of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRD) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to United States Postal Service. (SRD) |
Filing 3 INITIAL CASE ORDER - Notice of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Parties have 14 days from the date of this order to file their disclosure statement (if not already filed) and to notify the court of a related action (not required if there are no related actions). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 12/2/2022. (KM) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Anne C. Conway and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:22-cv-2225-ACC-EJK. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Postal Service with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20258274) filed by Juan Juarez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Proposed Summons in a Civil Action, #3 State Court Other Documents Plaintiffs Initial Disclosures, #4 State Court Other Documents Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosures Statement)(Lamb, Brian) Modified on 12/2/2022 to edit docket text (SRD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Juarez v. United States Postal Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Juan Juarez | |
Represented By: | Brian C. Lamb |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Postal Service | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.