Snell v. Gustafson et al
Marcia M. Snell |
Buffy Jo Gustafson, Buffy Jo Brown and Hasbrouck Real Estate Corporation |
Bruce Snell |
6:2022mc00007 |
March 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Embry J Kidd |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #1 Motion for Protective Order in light of the Notice of Withdrawal #4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 4/12/2022. (CB) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of withdrawal of motion by Bruce Snell re #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena MOTION for Protective Order filed by Bruce Snell. (LAB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip Kegler on behalf of Buffy Jo Gustafson, Hasbrouck Real Estate Corporation (Kegler, Philip) |
Filing 2 ENDORSED ORDER taking under advisement #1 Motion to Quash. The deposition is stayed until the Court resolves the pending Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 3/31/2022. (CB) |
FEES Paid by Marcia M. Snell (Filing fee $49.00, Receipt Number ORL103004). (ARJ) |
Filing 1 MOTION and Memorandum to Quash the Subpoena to Take the Deposition of Bruce Snell and MOTION for Protective Order by Bruce Snell. FILING FEE NOT PAID. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (SPM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.