United States of America v. King County, Washington et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: King County, Washington and Dow Constantine
Case Number: 6:2022mc00016
Filed: May 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Paul G Byron
Referring Judge: Daniel C Irick
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion to Compel. It is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 1) is GRANTED, such that on or before June 30, 2022, Classic shall produce all non-privileged, responsive documents to Defendants' Rule 45 subpoena (Doc. 1-1). The relief requested in this action having been addressed by this Order, the Clerk is directed to close the case. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 6/16/2022. (RN)
May 23, 2022 Filing 4 PROOF of service by Dow Constantine, King County, Washington (Dave, Yash)
May 20, 2022 Filing 3 Amended CERTIFICATE of service by Dow Constantine, King County, Washington re #1 MOTION to Compel Non-Party Classic Air Charter Inc.'s Compliance with Amended Subpoena to Produce Documents . (Dave, Yash) Modified on 5/23/2022 (SPM).
May 20, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE to counsel Ariel E. Martinez, Ashley D. Burman, Shane P. Cramer, Timothy P. Barnes and Timothy G. Leyh Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RDO)
May 18, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Non-Party Classic Air Charter Inc.'s Compliance with Amended Subpoena to Produce Documents by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(RDO) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. King County, Washington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: King County, Washington
Represented By: Ariel E. Martinez
Represented By: Ashley D. Burman
Represented By: Madison Shea Mahaffy
Represented By: Shane P. Cramer
Represented By: Timothy P. Barnes
Represented By: Timothy G. Leyh
Represented By: Yash B. Dave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dow Constantine
Represented By: Ariel E. Martinez
Represented By: Ashley D. Burman
Represented By: Madison Shea Mahaffy
Represented By: Shane P. Cramer
Represented By: Timothy P. Barnes
Represented By: Timothy G. Leyh
Represented By: Yash B. Dave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?