Cangar v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc.
Plaintiff: Manuela Cangar
Defendant: Luxottica Retail North America Inc. known now as Luxottica of American, Inc., a Foregin Profit Coporation doing business as Lenscrafters
Case Number: 6:2023cv00048
Filed: January 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Anne C Conway
Referring Judge: Leslie Hoffman Price
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended up to and including March 21, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 2/23/2023. (MKH)
February 22, 2023 Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Luxottica Retail North America Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Oakley, Inc., Corporate Parent EssilorLuxottica for Luxottica Retail North America Inc.. (Simpson, Amanda)
February 22, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Luxottica Retail North America Inc.. Related case(s): Yes (Simpson, Amanda)
February 22, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Luxottica Retail North America Inc.. (Simpson, Amanda) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price.
February 22, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda A. Simpson on behalf of Luxottica Retail North America Inc. (Simpson, Amanda)
February 22, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Nikolas Scott Dean on behalf of Luxottica Retail North America Inc. (Dean, Nikolas)
January 11, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Manuela Cangar. Related case(s): Yes (Chanfrau, Kelly)
January 11, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE by Manuela Cangar of Pendency of Other Actions (Chanfrau, Kelly) Modified on 1/11/2023-Notfied Attorney Chanfrau to refile using correct event (SRD).
January 11, 2023 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Manuela Cangar. (Chanfrau, Kelly)
January 11, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Kelly Hagan Chanfrau on behalf of Manuela Cangar. Lead Counsel: Kelly H. Chanfrau. (Chanfrau, Kelly)
January 11, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Luxottica Retail North America Inc. (SRD)
January 11, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE to counsel Kelly H. Chanfrau and Taylor Carley of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRD)
January 11, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel Taylor Carley of Local Rule 2.01(a), which requires membership or special admission in the Middle District bar to practice in the Middle District, except for the limited exceptions identified in the Rule. To apply for membership in the Middle District, visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRD)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL CASE ORDER - Notice of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Parties have 14 days from the date of this order to file their disclosure statement (if not already filed) and to notify the court of a related action (not required if there are no related actions). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 1/10/2023. (KM)
January 10, 2023 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Anne C. Conway and Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. New case number: 6:23-cv-0048-ACC-LHP. (SJB)
January 10, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Luxottica Retail North America Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20384596) filed by Manuela Cangar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Chanfrau, Kelly) Modified on 1/10/2023 to correct docket text(SJB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cangar v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manuela Cangar
Represented By: Kelly Hagan Chanfrau
Represented By: Taylor Grace Carley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luxottica Retail North America Inc. known now as Luxottica of American, Inc., a Foregin Profit Coporation doing business as Lenscrafters
Represented By: Amanda A. Simpson
Represented By: Nikolas Scott Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?