Wright v. The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
Plaintiff: Jovan Wright
Defendant: The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
Case Number: 6:2023cv00314
Filed: February 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy B Dalton
Referring Judge: Embry J Kidd
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2023 Filing 19 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Jovan Wright (Patti, Thomas)
March 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER dismissing case with prejudice re #16 Notice of settlement. All pending motions are denied as moot and all deadlines and hearings are terminated. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this file. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/13/2023. (ALL)
March 13, 2023 Filing 17 Remark: Doc. #15 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/10/2023. (EP)
March 13, 2023 Filing 16 Joint NOTICE of settlement by Jovan Wright (Zabaleta, Victor) Modified on 3/14/2023 to edit docket text (KNC).
March 9, 2023 Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Jovan Wright. (Zabaleta, Victor)
March 6, 2023 Filing 14 Remark: Doc. #11 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/6/2023. (EP)
March 3, 2023 Reset deadline for The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Answer due by 4/3/2023. (LDJ)
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant may have until and through April 3, 2023, to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 3/3/2023. (Kidd, Embry)
March 3, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Related case(s): No (Schuette, Michael)
March 3, 2023 Filing 11 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. (Schuette, Michael)
March 3, 2023 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time until 4/3/23 to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal by The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. (Schuette, Michael) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. Modified text on 3/3/2023 (LDJ).
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER TO STRIKE Plaintiff's Certificate of Interested Persons (Doc. 8). The filing fails to comply with the amended disclosure form, which went into effect December 1, 2022. See https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/forms/all/civil-forms. The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove Doc. 8 from the docket and Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a compliant form by Thursday, March 16, 2023. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 3/2/2023. (JLR)
March 1, 2023 Filing 8 (STRICKEN and REMOVED per Endorsed Order 9) CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Jovan Wright. (Zabaleta, Victor) Modified text on 3/2/2023 (LDJ).
March 1, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jovan Wright. Related case(s): Yes (Zabaleta, Victor)
March 1, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Victor Zabaleta on behalf of Jovan Wright. Lead Counsel: Victor Zabaleta, ESQ. (Zabaleta, Victor)
February 28, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Michael Schuette on behalf of The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. Lead Counsel: Michael P. Schuette. (Schuette, Michael)
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/27/2023. (ALL)
February 24, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel Thomas John Patti, III, Victor Zabaleta, Dayle Marie Van Hoose, and Michael Schuette of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LDJ)
February 24, 2023 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:23-cv-00314-RBD-EJK. (APV)
February 24, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Circuit Court, case number 2022-CC-018746-O filed in State Court on 10/28/2022. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-20546176) filed by The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schuette, Michael) Modified text on 2/24/2023 (LDJ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jovan Wright
Represented By: Thomas John Patti, III
Represented By: Victor Zabaleta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
Represented By: Dayle Marie Van Hoose
Represented By: Michael Schuette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?