Brooks v. Ampcus, Inc. et al
| Rufus Lovell Brooks |
| Ampcus, Inc. and ANJALI RAMAKUMARAN |
| 6:2023cv00613 |
| April 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 5/2/2023. (MEH)
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Rufus Lovell Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Mailing Envelope)(SRD) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Ampcus, Inc., Anjali Ramakumaran. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Complaint)(Feinberg, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Lucie Ailene Robinson on behalf of Ampcus, Inc., Anjali Ramakumaran. Lead Counsel: Matthew E. Feinberg. (Robinson, Lucie) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Ampcus, Inc., Anjali Ramakumaran. (Robinson, Lucie) |
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Matthew E. Feinberg is granted special admission to practice in the Middle District for purposes of this action pursuant to Local Rule 2.01(c), provided counsel shall register for and use the electronic filing system as adopted by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 4/7/2023. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Matthew E. Feinberg to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-20700285 for $150 by All Defendants. (Robinson, Lucie) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Mansitan Sow is granted special admission to practice in the Middle District for purposes of this action pursuant to Local Rule 2.01(c), provided counsel shall register for and use the electronic filing system as adopted by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 4/7/2023. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Mansitan Sow to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-20700184 for $150 by All Defendants. (Robinson, Lucie) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. Modified on 4/7/2023 to edit docket text (SRD). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Lucie A. Robinson, Matthew E. Feinberg, and Mansitan Sow of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SPM) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Matthew E. Feinberg and Mansitan Sow Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper; Pay the Special Admission Fee; Submit a Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration through PACER. Visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers for details (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SPM) |
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Orlando Division of the Middle District of Florida is currently operating in a Judicial Emergency due to a judicial vacancy and the number of cases in the division. Accordingly, civil cases, and especially newly filed civil cases, will be the Court's lowest priority unless emergency issues are presented. Counsel and the parties are encouraged to consider consenting to the Magistrate Judge for the entire case or disposition of any dispositive motions in order to have their case considered on a more timely basis. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/6/2023. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/6/2023. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/6/2023. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (ECJ)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:23-cv-613-CEM-DCI. (NAS) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Ampcus, Inc., ANJALI RAMAKUMARAN. Related case(s): Yes (Robinson, Lucie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, case number 482023CA001665A001OX filed in State Court on 2/23/2023. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-20683304 filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 State Court Other Documents, #5 State Court Other Documents, #6 State Court Other Documents, #7 State Court Other Documents, #8 State Court Other Documents, #9 State Court Other Documents, #10 State Court Docket Sheet, #11 Exhibit Exhibit D, #12 Exhibit Exhibit E, #13 Exhibit Exhibit F, #14 Civil Cover Sheet)(Robinson, Lucie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
