Cohan v. Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc.
| Howard Cohan |
| Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Fedex Office Ship & Print Center |
| 6:2023cv00981 |
| May 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ADA SCHEDULING ORDER setting various deadlines. See order for details. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 7/22/2023. (AKC)
|
| Filing 10 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent FedEx Corporation for Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. (Lehman, Gretchen) Modified on 7/19/2023 to edit text (ABC). |
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant may have until and through August 14, 2023, to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 7/11/2023. (Kidd, Embry)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. (Lehman, Gretchen) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. Modified on 7/12/2023 to edit text (ABC). |
| Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on 6/22/2023 by Howard Cohan as to Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. (Sconzo, Gregory) Modified on 6/27/2023 to edit docket text (LMW). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Howard Cohan. Related case(s): Yes (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Howard Cohan. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. (BCB) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL CASE ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement and Notice of Pendency of Other Actions due within 14 days. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 5/30/2023. (AKC)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Gregory A. Presnell and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:23-cv-981-GAP-EJK. (AET) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20881685) filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steven Sconzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Fedex Office Ship & Print Center | |
| Represented By: | Gretchen M. Lehman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
