Cortes v. Otis Elevator Company
Sharon Cortes |
Otis Elevator Company |
6:2023cv01141 |
June 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Wendy W Berger |
Daniel C Irick |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER: the parties are directed to confer, and then advise the Court, on the selection of a mediator, on or before August 28, 2023. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 7/27/2023. (RMF) |
Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 8/23/2023 Joinder of Parties due by 8/23/2023 Discovery due by 1/31/2025 Dispositive motions due by 3/4/2025 Pretrial statement due by 7/7/2025 All other motions due by 6/4/2025 Plaintiff disclosure of expert report due by 2/1/2024 Defendant disclosure of expert report due by 4/26/2024 Trial Status Conference set for 7/8/2025 at 10:00 AM in Orlando Courtroom 3 B before Judge Wendy W. Berger Jury Trial set for the August 2025 trial term commencing on 8/4/2025 at 09:00 AM before Judge Wendy W. Berger Conduct mediation hearing by 2/14/2025. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 7/27/2023. (RMF) |
Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Mavromatis, Felipe) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (RMF) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Middle District of Florida's revised Local Rules become effective February 1, 2021 and can be found on the Court's public website https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/local-rules. For a just and efficient resolution of this case, the parties are DIRECTED to read and comply with the Middle District of Florida's Local Rules. See Local Rule 1.01(a). Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Wendy W. Berger on 7/3/2023. (RMF) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Sharon Cortes. (Mavromatis, Felipe) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Felipe Mavromatis on behalf of Sharon Cortes. Lead Counsel: Felipe Mavromatis. (Mavromatis, Felipe) |
Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Otis Elevator Company.(Sacks, Robert) Modified on 6/23/2023 to edit docket text (KNC). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Robert E. Sacks on behalf of Otis Elevator Company. Lead Counsel: Robert E. Sacks. (Sacks, Robert) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Otis Elevator Company identifying Corporate Parent Otis Worldwide Corporation for Otis Elevator Company.. (Sacks, Robert) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (ECJ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ARL) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Wendy W. Berger and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:23-cv-1141-WWB-DCI. (ARC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County, FL, case number 2023-CA-012053-O filed in State Court on 05/10/2023. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-20951022 filed by Otis Elevator Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT A, #2 State Court Civil Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet D, #5 Exhibit E - Otis Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit - Letter to Plaintiff re_ Damages and Removal)(Sacks, Robert) Modified on 6/20/2023 as to docket text (ARL). Modified on 6/20/2023 (ARL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cortes v. Otis Elevator Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sharon Cortes | |
Represented By: | Felipe Mavromatis |
Represented By: | Carlos V. Leach |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Otis Elevator Company | |
Represented By: | Robert E. Sacks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.